|
| |||
FEATURE ARTICLE: SCI-FI MOVIES WE DO NOT WANT TO SEE
If we had wanted to see the same movie more than once, then we would buy that movie on
video and re-watch it whenever the fancy strikes us, not shell out several bucks at the
local multiplex. Only a few worthwhile sequels which have ever seen the light of the
projector, and were not really all that willing to see which new ones might
fall into such a category. Enough already!
The In Space No-One Can Hear You Snore genre made a comeback after the
unexpected commercial success of horror movies like Scream and Alien
rip-offs like The Relic and Species. Predictable to the bone: take a small group of
people, let them be chased around through darkly lit corridors by slimy monsters jumping
from the shadows and going boo, let everybody except dogs, kids and famous
movie stars die along the way a bit like those disaster movies.
At some stage the yanks decided that what we wanted to see was remakes of French
movies. Wrong! We already saw the French movies and as sure as heck didnt want to
see any inferior remakes. Listen, with home video we can watch old movies any time we
want. Plus, there is a reason why these movies are called classics
cause they cant be imitated. Especially when the tendency in Hollywood is to
strip a story of whatever made it special in the first place and add a layer or
superficial special effects and a loud soundtrack. No! We do not think that Forbidden Planet needs either of the two!
After the damned awful Batman & Robin, who can blame us?!
Big muscled men in skin-tight uniforms wearing their underwear on top belongs to the pages
of comic books, S&M magazines or the local mental asylum not the big screen.
Besides, the odds are that Joel (Batman Forever) Schumacher
would be involved in whatever comes our way . . .
Chrichton's literary output seems comprise a single plot: that of a small group of
people confronted by unknown force - the staple diet of many a Star Trek episode -
and Congo, Jurassic Park, The Lost World, Sphere, etc.
You know what Im referring to: the movies you have to sift through on your local videostores shelves to get to the good stuff. Movies so unbelievably cheap and shoddy that they were made especially for the video market without any hope - ever! of it making the big screen. Such blatant rip-offs that you can immediately see from which big screen main stream movie it stole its, ahem, ideas. Who watches this crap? Somebody must because every once in a while youll see sequels to movies youve never even heard of! EXAMPLES: Nemesis 3, Critters 5, Mars 2, Within the Rock
2, etc.
Ever since The Brady Bunch and Mission Impossible struck gold at the box office, the trend in Hollywood has been bringing movies based on old TV shows to the big screen. Thus we have seen Lost In Space and will later this year see The Avengers and My Favourite Martian. What is wrong with this approach?
See? A veritable minefield. Sure, making movies out of TV shows has in-built audience and hey, Hollywood has to make a living as well. But how about some new original material instead? EXAMPLES: The Prisoner, Star Trek Voyager, Deep Space Nine,
Thunderbirds (in development), Doctor Who, Blakes 7, Red
Dwarf, any other TV show you might vaguely recall from childhood.
almost
Click
here to receive our free weekly e-mail newsletter.
|
|
||