|
| |||
ALIEN VS. PREDATOR
It’s the biggest cinematic face-off since Freddy vs. Jason and . . . uhm, that’s just the problem. Is there anyone out there who can still remember anything from that 2003 movie besides the fact that one of the teenaged female stars probably had cute boobies? Still, making Alien vs. Predator is a no-brainer for 20th Century Fox since it teams up two of that studio’s most lucrative sci-fi franchises, the idea first being mentioned in Predator 2 which had a so-called “predator” dry-cleaning the skull of an alien (from the Alien movies). The concept was further exploited in a Dark Horse comic book series and a best-selling computer game. The trailer already has geeks across the globe drooling in anticipation. The only surprising thing about the whole affair is that it took Fox so long to get their act together to bring the franchise full circle back to its roots as a blockbuster movie. Then again, the Alien franchise stalled after the disappointment (financially and artistically) of the 1997 (!) Alien Resurrection. The Predator movie franchise (itself a rip-off of the original Alien movie when you think about it) also never got further than the 1987 original starring the current governor of California and the 1990 sequel starring Mel Gibson’s Lethal Weapon “too old for this sh*t!@#” partner Danny Glover.
And there lies the problem: Anderson isn’t a particularly good or original director (he also directed the haunted spaceship flick Event Horizon) and there’s a cast of complete unknowns. (Alas, there’s no Sigourney Weaver in sight.) Anderson will no doubt pull off a workman-like effort, but it will probably be a case of one exiting the cinema saying that the movie was simply “okay” instead of going “gosh! wow!”
But that has been the case with most of this summer’s blockbusters so far:
mediocre mega-budget special effects blockbusters such as
The Day After Tomorrow and
Van Helsing. Perhaps by August (when the
film is released in the States) audiences will be tired of yet another
such a special effects-driven vehicle. Or they might prove to be incurable
optimists . . . who knows? Fox is no doubt betting on the latter.
|
|
||