STARRING:
Warner Anderson, John Archer, Tom Powers, Dick Wesson, Erin O'Brien
Moore,
Ted Warde
1950, 91 Minutes, Directed by: Irving Pichel
Description:A private businessman arranges for an expedition to the moon before the
Russians get there first. The American astronauts fly there, establish a
base, but are not certain they have enough fuel to return to Earth. One of
the first science fiction films to attempt a high level of accurate
technical detail tells the story of the first trip to the moon.
—
Amazon.com
More sci than fi, this
fairly serious 1950’s vision of what a moon landing might like be one day
has no astronauts being confronted by alien monsters on the moon or
anything of the sort.
Scientifically accurate (for its day) to
the 9nth degree, Destination Moon instead boasts astronauts who use
too much rocket fuel in landing on the moon and then have to get rid of
excess weight so as to be able to escape the moon’s gravitational pull
again. You can see German rocket expert Hermann Oberth served as technical
advisor on the film, but it’s not particularly exciting watching a bunch
of guys in spacesuits dump some oxygen tanks on the surface of the moon to
be honest.
Maybe the movie should have stuck more closely to the
plot of Rocketship Galileo, the juvenile 1947 Robert Heinlein novel
on which it is based. In Heinlein’s original
novel three boys and their uncle build a spaceship in
their backyard which they use to travel to the moon where they discover
Nazis, all of which is ridiculous of course but sounds much more
exciting than dullard astronauts sawing rungs off ladders.
(Heinlein also contributed to the screenplay along with
John O’Hanlon and Rip van Ronkel, which unbelievable as it sounds is
not a complete nom de plume.
The author’s real name was Alford van Ronkel.)
"Heinlein's original novel had Nazis on the moon!"
According to this more serious-minded
movie the first mission to the moon was to be sponsored by American big
businesses because government can’t get its act together. Unknown enemies
(commies obviously, but never mentioned by name) would conspire to stop
the mission from ever happening, trying to sway American public opinion
against it.
The trip itself would be made in an atomic-powered V2 rocket.
The surface of the moon would have tall mountains and a surface like that
of a dry lake bed. As predictive science fiction
Destination Moon of course gets a lot wrong, and therein most of
its interest lies: it is representative of what people in the 1950s
thought a rocket trip to the moon would be like one day.
Big business falls in line by the way, because the
American military tells them that “the race is on
— and we'd better win it,
because there is absolutely no way to stop an attack from outer space. The
first country that can use the Moon for the launching of missiles... will
control the Earth. That, gentlemen, is the most important military fact of
this century.”
In
fairness the movie gets a lot right though. There is quite some “for
beginners” focus on space travel issues such as weightlessness in space,
the properties of vacuum, and the like —
all of which makes it about more scientifically accurate than 90% of most
science fiction movies today. Besides, it was produced by George Pal of
War of the Worlds and
Time Machine fame back then for $586, 000
— a tidy sum back then. Also, its idea of the
surface of the moon isn’t that far off. The special effects are quite good
for its time (it deservedly won an Academy award). One can easily imagine
Stanley Kubrick having watched it whilst “researching”
2001: A Space Odyssey and saying, “I can do this better…”
The movie’s biggest problem though is its plodding pace
and nondescript characters. Only one of the characters is notable from the
others, namely the one played by Dick Wesson, and that is only for his
heavy Brooklyn accent and annoying folkish demeanour. One almost pictures
Vin Diesel having based his grinning buffoon performance in Find Me
Guilty on him. Incidentally, in Destination Moon the first
words to be spoken by the first man on the moon are: “By the grace of God,
and the name of the United States of America, I take possession of this
planet on behalf of, and for the benefit of, all mankind.” We
kinda like Neil Armstrong’s better. . .