|
| ||||
THE PHANTOM MENACE
* * * STARRING: Liam Neeson, Ewan McGregor, Natalie
Portman, Jake Lloyd, Ahmed Best, Pernilla August, Frank Oz, Samuel L.
Jackson, Ray Park, Terence Stamp
It was with some anxious anticipation (after all, a lot of the reviews and word from fellow fans have terrible) and excitement (it is after all the first Star Wars in more than 16 years!) that I sat down for an early morning screening of The Phantom Menace along with hundreds of other cinema goers. And?
To be honest, I had a good time. It is a enjoyable movie and while I ignored most of the negative word surrounding the movie in that I did go to see it, it is nowhere as bad as some have made it out to be. Okay, so lowering one's expectations before going to see it might help. So will reading all those negative reviews. Beforehand I was afraid that I will be disappointed and so I didn't walk into the cinema expecting another Empire Strikes Back. Think more Return of the Jedi and you're on the right track . . . That doesn't mean that the critics are wrong. Everything they said is true: the plot is a tad too complicated, some of the actors are terrible (especially Jake Lloyd, the young boy playing Anakin Skywalker - that's Darth Vader to you, mister!), the clunky dialogue falls like leaden balls on the ears, the computer generated Jar Jar Binks character is annoying at times and the film is seriously lacking in interesting characters in that they are merely shunted from one scene to the next like cardboard cut-outs to satisfy the demands of the plot.
By focusing too much on the weaknesses of Phantom Menace, critics have made it out to be bad movie. What they meant is that it could have been a better movie - in that they are right, but what they neglected to mention was that that doesn't make Phantom Menace a bad movie - something it isn't. Actually it's better than its 2002 sequel,
Attack of the Clones.
Click
here to receive our free weekly e-mail newsletter.
|
|
|||